TheBlackberryAlarmclock.com

Thingish Things

Black Op Patriots

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 08•12


My father once told me that he and his fellow infantrymen in World War II kept a little distance from the snipers. The American ones that is. They kept as much distance as possible from the German marksmen.

The snipers induced discomfort in all those around them. Their type of killing was personal and exact, and even though they were taking out the enemy — the ones firing rifles and lobbing mortar shells their way — the snipers were to be avoided, without hurting their feelings of course.

In politics, the snipers are the “oppo” men, the never-seen-or-heard opposition  research experts who can take down an enemy campaign with a single shot. These are the guys — occasionally, but rarely, girls — who know how to scour for drunk-driving records, draft-dodging evidence, spousal infidelity, and prohibitively bad breath. Most people on a campaign never meet the “oppo” guy. Only one or two people know his name, and you know you’ve arrived when you’re one of them.  But everyone knows he is out there, lurking somewhere, like Kaiser Soze in the darkness. (His shadow becomes bigger and more powerful the more a campaign needs to be saved, like those fantastical savior weapons that never quite materialized were to the Japanese at the end of the aforementioned war.)

I ran into one my favorite “oppo” guys at a restaurant in New York some years back.  I hadn’t seen him in a long time. I asked where I could reach him to catch up. He handed me a card for a California company and said, straight faced, “Call this number and ask for me.  They’ll say they don’t know me.  Tell  ’em you want to leave a message for me anyway.” That’s too good a line to discard from the mind. 

There is a tell-all book just out from two oppo research experts wonderfully titled “We’re With Nobody,” the standard answer to anyone asking what you’re doing rifling through the stacks of the Pentagon with knee pads, a coffee thermos, and three sandwiches. “We’re just aspiring college students hoping to freelance an online column for a publication that hasn’t started yet.” That kind of thing.  It has to be worth a read for anyone interested in politics.

But like snipers, oppo men are essential, not just to campaigns, but to American democratic success. No one else has the time, resources, or expertise to parse candidates to the extent they do. Good journalists can do the work, but newspapers don’t have the budgets anymore to put investigative researchers on drill-down missions that most often meet dry wells. They pay reporters to write, and to write every day. Only campaigns are willing to expend five-figure sums to have trained eyes look through the enemies trash — and that of their own candidate.

The higher the level the candidate, the more important the “oppo” team becomes. At the federal level, a compromised candidate — one with a hidden life — is an instant candidate for blackmail. John Edwards, Gary Hart, and Herman Cain all ran for president with giant skeletons in the closets. That’s dangerous, not just to them but to the country.

“We’re with Nobody” is sure to raise eyebrows and bring additional ignominy to the field of politics.  But it shouldn’t.  As wary of them as I am — do they have a file on me??? — opposition researchers do their duty and they do it well. Heck, they could start a union, if they would only emerge from the shadows to show up at the meetings.  

Taking a Page from Donald Trump, Obamagirl Equivocates

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 07•12

http://youtu.be/dyjXt1zSXHU

So goes Obamagirl, so goes the nation? So would Amber Lee Ettinger like us to believe in seeking her second five minutes of fame by equivocating on whether she will vote for President Obama in 2012. You know what?  I bet she gets it. The Donald must be blushing.  

Running from the Bear

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 07•12

Fifty-two percent of New Yorkers told Siena pollsters this week that New York State is on the right track. Based on where we were  14 months ago, I’d say they are right. New York is moving in a far better direction than it was under Governor David Paterson and an inept Democratic-controlled state senate in December 2010.

But if voters were asked to compare New York’s direction with that of other states, I suspect we would be seeing far different numbers. In today’s Wall Street Journal we read about a strategic tax rebellion taking places in American “heartland” states tired of watching jobs move out of state or overseas. These states are working to eliminate state income taxes and/0r property taxes and/or  corporate taxes.  In short, they are seeking to compete for business with low-tax states like Texas as a way to grow business. Even Maine and New Jersey, hardly bastions of conservative economic thinking, are getting in on the game, seeking to lower income taxes to attract and retain businesses and jobs. 

In New York, the debate, as usual, is going in the other direction:  We just passed a “millionaire’s” income tax hike, and discussion continues on so called “living wage” legislation and raises in the minimum wage.  Both would chase more businesses from New York. And our public employee unions are threatening to go to war over the modest pension reform proposals. Visit https://www.laborlawcc.com/new-york-labor-law-posters-state-and-federal-combo.html to make sure that you are covered under your state and federal compliance laws.

There’s the old quip, “How fast do you have to run to get away from a bear?”  Answer: “A little faster than the guy next to you.” It applies to economics, too, and New York is more than a step behind.   

Contest: Finish Chuck Schumer’s Sentence

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 06•12

http://youtu.be/YdlY1X9R5Ec

U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer is claiming responsibility for preventing Brighton Beach Brooklyn from going ______? 

That’s the question of the day, based on Mr. Schumer’s boastful — and suddenly abbreviated — remarks in the above video shot last week.  

“We helped bring the Russians to the community in Brighton Beach,” Schumer brags. “We had a phone number, when a Russian got off the plane, you need an apartment, look up, call this number and that’s how we filled up Brighton Beach and prevented it from going_____.” 

New York’s verbose senator has never been at a loss for words.  So what is the missing word, Mr. Schumer?  You were saying something….

Had someone else made such a pointedly awkward statement, Mr. Schumer would be marching down some boulevard right now, his arms linked with Al Sharpton’s. 

The Church and Statism

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 06•12

 

Secular Heresy in Walnut Grove

What would cause the City of New York to out-of-the-blue ordain religious services verboten in city schools off hours?

Why?  Why now?

Most people probably had no idea that school gyms have been rented for years on weekends by poor congregations, of many faiths, to hold services. But they have been. And all for the good.

A school is a building. It is a roof over one’s head. Schools across America have doubled as places for Saturday or Sunday services since before the American Revolution. Haven’t City officials ever seen Little House on the Prairie? The Waltons?

Or does the City believe that the air in schools is somehow tainted during weekends by religious scholarship and prayer? (But the hot air of politicians at weekend church lecterns is sweet smelling.) 

Stories like these leave me feeling a little sick. I am not pious, but I fear for the future when witnessing the systematic excision of all things religious or spiritual, with even the most casual association with government, e.g., the Menora or Christmas tree in a village square. I am hardly alone in that.

Dogmatic secularism is the religion of government today. It is more rigid than any religious orthodoxy west of Kabul. From Washington to City Hall, doctrinaire bureaucrats seek out breaches in their ideology like dogs sniffing out opiates in an airport (oh, how Marx would love that.)

Meanwhile, 60% of all African-American pregnancies and 40% of all pregnancies in New York City are aborted each year.  This rush to secularism is really paying off. 

Quote of the Day, Victor Davis Hansen

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 05•12

 

“Gingrich should carefully play a tape of his post–Nevada caucus performance, and then he would quickly grasp that it was little more than a litany of excuses, whining, and accusations — characterized by stream-of-conscious confessionals and rambling repetitions. And, I think, will hurt him more than anything yet in the campaign.”–Victor Davis Hansen, National Review, The Corner, Feb. 5, 2012

Kcehc Siht Tuo!

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 04•12

http://youtu.be/4O0ubiIYYYY

Is there like, say, a military application for this? 

Who Put Him in Charge?

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 04•12

What odious mental malady convinces some people that they have a say over what the rest of us do? A certain sub-segment of the population has it.  You can begin spotting them in around fourth or fifth grade when they start using words like “let’s.”  By high school, they are yearbook editor; by adulthood they chair the local community board. I don’t suffer from it, but if I did, I’d suggest that its victims be tattooed on the forehead with the bold letters B.B. for “Busy Body” as a warning to the rest of us.  

National Review’s Rich Lowry writes today on a group of these BB’s obsessed with sugar. In his piece, “Enter the Cupcake Cops“, Mr. Lowry takes special aim at one University of California San Francisco professor — is it any surprise? — who is helping lead the charge to regulate what your children and mine are allowed to ingest.  His name is Robert Lustig. Professor Lustig is seriously suggesting, among other things, that adolescents be carded when buying soft drinks to prove that they are at least 17 years of age. 

The NR editor writes:

There is a vigorous debate among researchers about how harmful sugar is, and Lustig — as you might imagine — takes the dire view. This fuels his push for “gentle ‘supply side’ control strategies” to limit the intake of sugar, including “taxation, distribution controls, age limits.” He and his co-authors muse about “zoning ordinances to control the number of fast-food outlets and convenience stores in low-income communities, and especially around schools.”

Under this regime, we’ll go from gun-free school zones to Snickers-free school zones. Lustig & Co. seriously propose starting to card young people who try to buy a Dr Pepper, with an age cutoff of 17. This will make 17 a fraught age: Old enough (with parental consent) to join the military and old enough to buy chocolate milk.

What I find even more disconcerting is the number of seemingly normal people who have expressed agreement with these police-state tactics after reading prior posts on this site. The argument is always the same:  If we have to pay for the effects of obesity through our tax dollars, then we should have a say over what others put in their bodies.

How’s this as a compromise? Keep government out of healthcare and allow people to eat, smoke, or drink whatever the hell the want. 

Let’s. 

Read the Warning Label

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 04•12

 

I’ve had a few nights like this one

Instant Classic

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Feb• 04•12

The Forgotten Man

Instant classic.