TheBlackberryAlarmclock.com

Thingish Things

Obama Smackdown in Westchester

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Apr• 04•12

Not a lot of people have been watching what the federal government has been trying to do to Westchester County. And they may never know about it now, thanks to Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino who just went toe-to-toe with the Obama Administration in court and beat them.

Mr. Obama’s Justice Department labeled Westchester County, an attractive suburb immediately north of New York City, a racist enclave. Its reasoning? Not enough black and Hispanic people live on the most expensive blocks in the most expensive neighborhoods within the county’s wealthiest towns and villages. The county itself is plenty diverse — it’s as diverse as Manhattan and the third most diverse county in New York State — but the Obama Administration wanted to force the County to integrate towns virtually block-by-block, demanding that they change hundred-year-old zoning ordinances and local infrastructure to accommodate multi-family dwellings. State-of-the-art public housing being built by the Astorino Administration in high-priced villages was insufficient, the Obama Justice Department argued in federal court. Mr. Astorino had to “break down barriers” to the most desirable neighborhoods.

The Obama Administration never once considered that these “barriers” are financial. Damned straight some blocks in Westchester are exclusive. They’re exclusive because the houses on those streets cost a fortune. There are homes within three miles of me that give Versailles a run for its money. And as much as I’d like to move my family into one of them — or into one of the barns on their properties — I cannot, because I don’t have enough money. (Can I sue someone?) Some of those houses, incidentally, have “for sale” signs posted alongside the road.  They don’t read “for sale for rich white people”, they read “for sale.”  That means anyone with enough money can buy the thing.  Got that, Mr. Obama? 

The Obama Administration attempted this Orwellian overreach under the auspices of a housing settlement signed with the federal government by a past county executive. Westchester was to be a test case for upscale communities around the nation that would be deemed racist because of the price tags of their housing stock. Think of the implications of that. The federal government would have gained the power to determine the racial and economic balance of every neighborhood in America.  That may sound Kumbaya to some, but it sounds like Maoist China to me.  

America — and Westchester County —  have been integrating on their own in recent decades to match economic and demographic shifts. And that integration will hopefully continue to the benefit of all of us. But not at the point of a federal sword, thanks to one brave New York county executive. The power that would have given Washington would have been frightful. 

I was proud to call Rob Astorino a friend and client yesterday.  I am prouder still to call him a friend and client today. He’s got guts. 

Obama Oils the Skids

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Apr• 03•12

If there was any question about which direction President Obama’s polling shows him going — forget his recent blip among women in national surveys — his campaign’s “Big Oil” attack ad launched today against Mitt Romney answers any doubters.  Mr. Obama knows he is about to take a shellacking from rising gas prices, which promise to get worse over the summer months. AAA reported yesterday that gas prices rose again last week, this time by four cents per gallon. 

The Obama Administration is damned on this issue for three reasons — it blocked drilling contracts over the past three years;  it opposed the Keystone XL Pipeline, and it lost billions of taxpayer dollars in guaranteeing loans for dubious “clean energy” start ups like Solyndra. Add to that remarks made by Mr. Obama’s Energy Secretary about the Administration wanting high gas prices, and the President has a real problem. 

So what does he do?  He attacks the oil industry itself and paints Mr. Romney as its lackey. Can anyone image JFK or FDR or RWR attacking a major American industry for political gain? And on the very same day, Mr. Obama lashed out at  Supreme Court Justices as “un-elected” “judicial activists” for criticizing his probably unconstitutional health care plan. We are entering a surreal world with this administration — and it’s only April. 

Mr. Cuomo’s Party

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Apr• 03•12

New York State senator Jeff Klein (D-Bronx) correctly observed yesterday what everyone but  those on the hard left recognizes: Andrew Cuomo is improving the brand of the Democratic Party. He is bringing an image of competence and centrism to an organization that had spun out of control in New York just a couple of years back.

These pages have long thought that would happen. Indeed, they predicted that Mr. Cuomo might go so far as to remake the party in his image in New York. And by challenging and weakening buffoonish union leaders like the CSEA’s Danny Donahue, Governor Cuomo just may pull that off.

Many of the governor’s reforms to date have been cosmetic. His two-percent property tax cap sans mandate relief and his watered-down Tier Six pension system will slow, not save, New York and its municipalities on their path to insolvency, but the public rightly recognizes them as solid steps forward.  It is impossible to miss them as such after witnessing the  chaos that was Albany under 100% Democratic rule two years ago. There’s no question: Mr. Cuomo and the Republican Majority in the State Senate have found an easy working relationship and it’s paying off for all of us.

The CSEA is running hysterical radio ads — crazy hysterical, not haha hysterical — across the state this week bashing Governor Cuomo and the Legislature for the modest budget reforms they ushered in this session. Their tone was the governing norm in New York 24 months ago. It is now clearly at the margins. Nice work, Mr. Cuomo.

Going, Going, Gone

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Apr• 01•12

 

rawingsketchaday.blogspot.com

Was feeling downright ancient at a birthday party this afternoon for my five-year-old twin niece and nephew. When did all the parents get so young, I kept thinking. So, as a half-subconscious remedy,  I figured I’d kick it to one of the young mothers.  Here’s how it went:

(Two of us peering through a window within a gymnastics center.) 

Me: “Any Olympic material out there? I’m scouting for Madrid 2024.” 

She: “Haven’t seen any yet.” 

Me: “That’s okay. Someone has to cheer from the stands.”

She: [laughs] 

Me: “Hi, I’m Bill O’Reilly.  I’m Gerry’s brother.”

She:  “Hi, I’m xxxxx.”

Me: “Mine’s the one with the pink monkey on her shirt; think Nadia Comaneci meets Mary Lou Retton. Is that one over there yours?”

She: “Yep.  That’s him. He’s my little brother.” 

Just wait ’til my wife gets a hold of this…

Prediction: Santorum Out Pre PA Primary

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Mar• 29•12

Seventy percent of Intrade Market bettors are wagering that Mitt Romney wins the April 24 Pennsylvania Primary. I think he will, too, purely based on his campaign organization.  To me, that strongly suggests that native son and former Keystone State senator Rick Santorum will exit the presidential contest soon before April 24th. Losing in Pennsylvania would be a blow that Mr. Santorum — who is only 53 — might never recover from.  He has done too well this primary season to let that happen. 

Mr. Santorum exiting pre-Pennsylvania could be what is keeping Newt Gingrich’s toe wistfully in the race. Perhaps he is betting, too, that Santorum will drop within a month. No one is betting on Mr. Gingrich for anything, though. His campaign all but ended weeks ago. When Rick Santorum capitulates, the race is over. 

414-0

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Mar• 29•12

This is staggering.  President Obama’s proposed budget was just voted down 414-0 in the House of Representatives. Not a single vote for it. Not one Democrat nor Republican. I wonder how many times in history that has happened in the House. Ever? 

We’re All Going to Die!

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Mar• 29•12

A cousin wrote a prescient novel a few years back that introduced an idea whose day may be nearing. It was called Boomsday and it satirized the now arrived era when baby boomers retire in overwhelming numbers and young Americans get stuck with their bills for Social Security and Medicare. The solution in the novel? Americans pledging to off themselves at some predetermined age in exchange for generous tax breaks during their most productive years. Interesting concept.

I may very well have signed such as pact as I walked into a medical appointment yesterday for the first time in too many years, according to the health care industry anyway.  There I sat with droves of elderly Americans handing over their last saved dollars, and the dollars of others, for every conceivable medical procedure, 100% of which will fail in the end. Everyone in the waiting room, including me, has a fatal condition called life, and all the money in the world cannot overcome it for long.

I walked out of my appointment with a fistful of referrals.  (How can someone so young and vibrant have so many problems?) I have an umbilical cord to be surgically fixed (try and find me for that one), a full-body skin cancer screening,  a MRA brain scan (I know, I know…), an eye doctor’s appointment, and an approaching-50 fanny procedure that may induce me, ala Boomsday, to choose 49 as my exit scenario, providing I can get a healthy lump-sum tax rebate.  Bora Bora or a scope in the ol’ you-know-what…? It’s really not a tough call.

What is it about life that makes us all want to hold onto it so dearly, even when we are re-diapered? What brings us to the counters of medical mills, open wallets in hand, willing to trade the fruits of a lifetime for a few extra moments of O2?  I suppose air is sweet, and it must grow sweeter with every passing day.  Because there at the counter, probably will go I in 30 years — unless I can knock off, say, 18% of my marginal tax rate beginning…now.

Boomsday.  It was ahead of its time.  At 10 bucks on Amazon, it’s a steal.

The Audacity of Rangel

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Mar• 27•12

nytimes.com

It is amazing that the Republic has survived 236 years with representatives in office like Charlie Rangel (D-NY) and his supporters. His defiance in receiving the lightest slap on the wrist today for stealing money and public benefits over a period of years in the form of four rent controlled apartments is the stuff of Tammany-Hall-style legend. If one sought to capture the arrogance  of the American career politician under a glass, one could not have found a more perfect specimen to display.

Rangel, for anyone who has forgotten, was caught living in three rent-controlled Harlem apartments — he combined all three to create a pied-à-terre overlooking Central Park — and using a fourth, several floors below, for a campaign office.  Several problems: 1. Rent-controlled apartments are supposed to be for lower-income people; not the then chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee with a secret Caribbean hideaway; 2. Even the poorest New Yorker is prohibited by law from having more than one rent-controlled apartments, much less four, and 3. It is illegal to use rent-controlled apartments for business, especially for the business of congressional campaigns.

So how did Mr. Rangel, through a spokesman, respond to a miniscule $23,000 fine for his actions?  Here is the quote: “People settle not because they’re guilty but because they don’t want to go through the arduous process and expense to show they’re not guilty.” This after Mr. Rangel fought the legal proceedings against him for more than three years.

Whenever Charlie Rangel comes under fire for these and other misdeeds, he goes on attack or pulls out his Korean War veteran card. What that has to do with his crooked behavior God only knows.  We all thank him for his service; now what about those apartments, Charlie?

The worst example of modern politics is not Mr. Rangel, though.  He is merely a player on the grand stage. The real culprits are those who condone his behavior by attending lavish parties for him in the wake of the scandal, return him to office time after time, and erect monuments in his name — with taxpayer dollars — throughout Harlem. They are now monuments to gross political arrogance. 

Charlie Rangel is an amiable man and a talented politician.  But in the end, he is a crook, like so many others. And an unrepentant one at that.

Jane Fonda as Nancy Reagan?

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Mar• 27•12

We learn today that Jane Fonda is going to play Nancy Reagan in an upcoming movie.  But, psst, here’s what I’m hearing:  Mrs. Reagan is planning to come out of retirement to play “Hanoi Jane, the Later Years.” Watch for it. 

God’s Speed, Mr. Carvin

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Mar• 25•12

Attended a news conference for a client today who will be running for congress this year against 24-year incumbent Nita Lowey (D-NY-17). (Remember when longevity in office was a good thing?)  The candidate, Joe Carvin (R), was endorsed at the event by another prospective candidate for the seat, who ended his endorsement remarks with the words “God speed, Mr. Carvin.”

It’s funny, those were the exact words I had in my head this morning when reading this column by George Will.  Mr. Will’s piece is about the Supreme Court argument beginning this week against Obamacare. The lead attorney arguing the case? Michael Carvin, Joe’s younger brother. (Impressive family, those Carvins.)

I can’t remember a more important case before the Court in my lifetime. This will determine just how much the federal government can force individual Americans to do. If it is decided that the feds can force us to sign contracts and purchase products against our will, then it can make us do virtually anything. I don’t know about you, but that’s not the America I wish to live in going forward.  

Which brings me back to the sentiment from this morning. God speed, Mr. Carvin. And in more contemporary parlance, kick some … in there. Your countrymen are depending on you.