TheBlackberryAlarmclock.com

Thingish Things

Political Blood Sport

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 17•12

http://youtu.be/5Aohgrn1peA

A candidate I once worked for launched a political campaign on a television program, pledging to stay positive throughout the race.  The interviewer burst out laughing on the set –genuinely. I remember thinking at the time, “We’ll show him.”  A month later, we were in the thick of one of the nastiest campaigns in memory. 

The Ron Paul ad above made me think about that race. The spot is one of a gazillion vitriolic ads running in South Carolina and Florida right now. Those halcyon days of GOP primary love are surely over. Summer pledges of party unity are now burst-out-loud funny.

Politics. ‘Tis a blood sport. Invariably. 

Quote of the Day, Newt Gingrich

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 16•12

from sketchpot.blogspot.com

“I think an intelligent conservative wants the right federal employees delivering the right services in a highly sufficient way and then wants to get rid of those folks that are, in fact wasteful, or those folks who are ideologically so far to the left…”–Newt Gingrich, 01-16-12

Not for nothing, but isn’t that how dictatorships begin? 

Who’s Parenting Our Children?

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 15•12

U.S. education bureaucrats have gone mad. And parents like me are letting them get away with it. 

The New York Post reports today that school officials on Long Island and elsewhere are now placing electronic devices on children they deem “overweight” to monitor the children’s physical activities. They are doing it without even asking the permission of parents. If I wasn’t so busy watching kids and running errands today, I might chain myself to the Education Department’s doors.

That’s the problem.  While we are all busy living our lives, health and school are officials are walking farther and farther over their lines of authority.  Every time they get away with it, they are emboldened to take another step. Parents, myself included, let it happen and, in the process, hand more leash to “the professionals” each year.

The New York City, Department of Education ideologues are implementing a mandatory sex ed program that includes sending middle-schoolers to drug stores to catalogue condom brands and types. Other homework assignments will include sending kids to abortion clinics to request a list of services, and mapping out the route between school — not the students’ homes — and the clinic. Not a single public hearing — not one —  has been held to inform parents about the new curriculum.

Strapping obesity monitors on children and cataloging condoms may be fine with a lot of parents, but I bet it’s not okay with many more.  The larger issue, though, is who is giving U.S. educational “professionals” the chutzpah to so freely cross these lines. The answer, sadly, is we are.  Too many us who disagree with what’s happening let it go on every day without a fight.  I am the guiltiest among us. 

Is Panetta Playing Good Cop Bad Cop?

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 15•12

One hopes the Obama Administration is paired with Israel in a game of good-cop-bad-cop against Iran. That’s the only thing that would make sense after reading of the latest Administration admonitions to Israel on that nation’s plans to take out Iranian nuclear-weapon facilities. Iran has not only promised to develop a weapon as soon as possible, it has vowed to use it to “wipe Israel off the face of the map.”

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who plainly told CBS a month ago that military force would be used before Iran gets its first nuclear weapon, is now warning Israel against such a move, saying Israel is not giving negotiations time to succeed. Those “negotiations” have been going on since George W. Bush’s first term. Mr. Panetta is a super-smart guy; he can’t be played for the fool by Iran. Right? 

Or was his 60 Minutes interview audience intended to be the Israeli government and not the American public?  One hopes not.  It is more reassuring to believe in the good-cop-bad-cop scenario. Because once Iran has that weapon, the world will be a very different place. 

Mr. Obama’s Debt Request

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 12•12

 

U.S. Taxpayers Now Owe Almost the Total Cost of WWII. Germany's Dresden in late 1944 shown here.

The U.S. D-Day Museum estimates the total economic cost of WWII — all nations combined — at $1.6 trillion. One could spend two lifetimes itemizing the destruction wrought during that war on Europe and Asia, and the staggering amount of war materials used therein by the Allied and Axis powers. Many, many cities were flattened to the ground in World War II and had to be rebuilt. Tens of millions of troops had to be paid, fed, clothed (and buried); more airplanes, tanks, ships, and munitions were assembled than ever before.  The period between 1939 and 1945 constituted the largest mobilization and destruction of man and materiel in human history. 

President Obama announced today that he will be asking the Congress to raise the debt limit (borrow) an extra $1.2 trillion. The practice has become almost routine, and his request will not even be the biggest story of the day tomorrow. 

Sure, $1.6 trillion in 1945 and $1.2 trillion in 2012 are apples and oranges when inflation is considered. (The total cost of WWII would be around $19 trillion today, according to back-of-the-napkin math.) But it’s instructive, I think, to get a sense of just how much the federal government is borrowing these days. With our debt now exceeding $15 trillion we almost owe the combined cost of all of the Second World War, with no post-war industrial boom in sight. 

And many in government want to spend and borrow more. It’s too frightening to consider. 

The Perry-Gingrich Gift

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 11•12

Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich have given Mitt Romney an extraordinary gift.  Their anti-free-market rants against Mr. Romney and his former firm Bain Capital have made the ex Massachusetts governor a cause célèbre among conservative talk show hosts like Sean Hannity. These were the exact hosts who have been wary of Mr. Romney’s conservative bona fides for the past five years. Great piece on this by Justin Sink of The Hill today. 

If I didn’t know better I’d say Newt is working for Mitt Romney.  His attacks may very well propel Mr. Romney into the White House. Nicely done. 

NYC Health Police Gone Wild, Part 923 (Update)

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 11•12

An observation from the 19th Century German poet Heinrich Heine came to mind this morning upon cracking the pages of The New York Post.  The prescient lyricists, 100 years before the rise of Adolf Hitler, wrote, “Where they burn books, they will ultimately burn people.” 

In other words, those who attempt to eradicate free will and free ideas — those so sure of their own orthodoxy — are the greatest threat to humankind, regardless of the populist rationale they give when igniting that first page.

One gets the feeling, after learning of the New York City Health Department’s latest plans to demand compliance with its orthodox thinking over eating, drinking, and smoking, that, given free reign, its so-sure-of-themselves commissioners might eventually line fat, drunken New York bon vivants up against a wall and paddle them. Or, in a more likely scenario, send them to  re-education therapy sessions in the name of public health.

The New York Health Department has gone power mad. It is out of control. After banning restaurants from cooking with certain ingredients — the Department tried to regulate how much salt New York chefs could put in their vichyssoise — and banning smoking outside, the Health Department now wants to give busy-body community boards the right to decide where and how many liquor stores, bars, and alcohol-serving restaurants can exist in their neighborhoods.  In other words, it is giving committees power over the free market system in the name of health.  

The city will argue that this is no different then granting a liquor or restaurant license, but it fundamentally is.  Those permits are given based on merit, not ideology.  This is not bureaucracy, it is social engineering 202. 

If The New York City Department of Health had dictatorial powers, is there anyone who believes it would not outlaw tobacco, salt, soda, candy, desserts, alcohol, television, cars, and all but a few restaurants tomorrow?  I honestly believe it would. Like those who try to regulate what we read, the Department is trying regulate what we eat and drink. It’s madness. 

The health police are the greatest threat to American freedom today. It’s not the salt and booze regulations that are worrisome, it is the rigid certainty behind them. That kind of thinking is mankind’s greatest enemy. It is far more dangerous than alcoholism, obesity, or lung cancer. 

UPDATE:  Mayor Bloomberg wisely put the kabash on this plan following this morning’s Post story.  

Newt Hearts Mitt

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 10•12

Is there any end to the love being showered on Mitt Romney from former Georgia Congressman Newt Gingrich?

The Earl of Pomposity generously assumed frontrunner status in the final weeks of the Iowa Caucuses, freezing the rest of the GOP field in place before predictably collapsing. Now Mr. Gingrich and his casino magnate backer are unleashing the very same attacks on Mr. Romney that President Obama’s team were likely saving to use on the Massachusetts governor in September and October. The attacks will now be ancient news in the general election fight. On top of that, by attacking capitalism itself in his scorched-earth campaign on Mr. Romney’s time as a turnaround titan at Bain Capital, Mr. Gingrich has disqualified himself from the Republican nomination — for anything.

Who says Newt Gingrich is an irascible guy? To me, he is looking like a huggable Teddy Bear. A Teddy Bear with pursed lips that loudly go “smooch” against Mitt Romney’s cheek. 

Übermoms, Überdaughters

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 08•12

Nothing like a trip to a West Side children’s theater to make one feel normal – and lacking. I was one of a handful of fathers at the 11:00 performance today of “Pinkalicious” on West 60th Street, and it was like wandering into a super-mom convention.

The lady on my left was speaking French to her daughter; the lady behind me was planning to write a book with hers (they resolved on the spot to undertake a study of Manhattan cupcakes – vanilla and house-specials – over a period of a year and publish their notes and photographs for the mommy market.) The lady in front of me had three daughters, one of whom engagingly disagreed with a statement I offered my daughter. Before I could strike up a chat with this delightful young soul, the word “boundaries” was spoken twice, once sharply at her and once apologetically to me.  “Um, it’s okay,” I said wondering what the girl had done wrong.

There were around 200 seats in the theater, and there must have been twice that many graduate degrees. One could feel them – see them – manifested in the organic snacks and flash cards popping out in the minutes before the curtain opened.  “Want another Twizzler, Gigi,?” I half-whispered. (I forgot the Jujyfruits.)

Here’s what went on in my head in the hour everyone else spent watching the show (although Pinkalicious’s stage friend admittedly drew an overabuldance of my attention): This super-kid thing is utter madness. It’s desperate. Toward what end is all this done? Can’t anyone trust his child-rearing instincts anymore? New York children are being taught by theory instead of parents.  This is secular humanist brainwashing. When did I stop being a New Yorker and start being a suburban dad? Can’t kids just be kids? Growing up in Manhattan wasn’t like this when I was a kid, was it? The way we are raising our children is definitely better, right?  Sitting under a tree for an hour beats two hours of flash cards hands down.

And then on my way home, during a stop at the supermarket, I bought instead of our regular milk, for the very first time, Organic DHA-Omega 3 milk that purports to support “brain health” (whatever that means.) It probably cost around nine bucks.  But hey, it’s murder out there.  My kids need a fighting chance.

But here’s the rub.  I bought it in chocolate. Sue me!

Can Perry Claw Back?

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Jan• 06•12

Rick Perry’s decision to stay in the GOP presidential primary until at least South Carolina is a good one. Mr. Perry, who entered the race from a cannon before falling to earth like, well, a cannonball at the end of its arc, was just beginning to get the feel of things at the close of the Iowa Caucuses, it seemed. He had just started getting comfortable and likable on the stump and on the stage.

The Texan will never be mistaken for Cicero in debate. He’s just not very good at it. But he is at least coming across as sincere and grounded now, if a little synaptically-challenged. But who hasn’t opened a refrigerator door only to ask himself, “What am I doing here?” Having that occur on a national stage is forgivable, even endearing to the most generous of us.

The Perry camp argues that there is still room in the race for an anti-Romney candidate — clearly there is — and that Mr. Perry has a better organization and a better story (jobs, jobs, jobs) than former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum. He does. It is perfectly logical then that Mr. Perry stay in. But even more than that, it feels right. Governor Perry doesn’t seem quite done yet.

If Rick Perry runs anything but first or second in South Carolina, he will probably be done for good. But if he somehow manages to win the state, he could be right back in the national race. If he gets there — and the odds are long — he’ll need to stop memorizing talking points and keep being himself.  He’s better that way.