TheBlackberryAlarmclock.com

Thingish Things

U.S. Tax Dollars to China

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 04•11

 

Chinese High Speed Rail, Courtesy of U.S. Taxpayers

A friend and neighbor sent me this Associated Press story today reporting on a fledgling bi-partisan effort in the U.S. Senate to stop sending “development aid” to China.  Ya think?  Twelve senators have signed on so far.  (Twelve?  I would have thought 99 would be sponsors — self-professed socialist Bernie Sanders from Vermont probably wants to double the aid.)

U.S. taxpayers have sent $275 million in direct aid to China since 2001, AP reports.  Our money went to improve China’s public transportation system and Internet service, while U.S. bridges and roadways collapse. Meanwhile, China is pouring its resources into building a nuclear navy to challenge America’s maritime predominance. 

How did this funding possibly make it through last week’s budget cuts?  Are you kidding me? 

Obama’s Very First Ad

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 04•11

http://youtu.be/UPy7RnHwvmA

Thought it might be interesting to post the very first Obama for President campaign ad.  His committee wasn’t event formed when this spot went up.  It was aired by DraftObama.org, a precursor to Obama for President.  

He sure looks a whole lot younger than he does today…

Contrast the ad with President Obama’s remarks in Chicago last night: “When I said ‘change we can believe in’ I didn’t say ‘change we can believe in tomorrow.'”

Too many promises. 

 

Obama in Major Trouble

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 04•11

There is a 2,800-word bombshell story in Politico this morning outlining the depth and multitude of challenges President Obama’s re-election team is facing.

These pages have touched several times over the months on this, particularly how the state-by-state nature of presidential contests lines up against President Obama in November 2012.  In short, Obama is in big trouble, and he would easily lose re-election today against Mitt Romney in particular.

Here is what Jim VandaHei and Mike Allen of Politico write about the electoral map:

All of these points meet on the electoral map, which isn’t looking great for Obama.

The country seems to hate all of Washington, where as in 2008 it was much more down on the GOP and the Bush years.

And putting aside the bleak psychological climate Obama faces as he starts his run, the physical terrain – the states needed add up to 270 electoral votes – looks more difficult than Democratic officials had expected even a few months ago. Obama’s electoral map from 2008 will be tough to duplicate, with all three perennial bellwethers – Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania – once again up for grabs.

The states Obama won in 2008 have lost six electoral votes, complicating his quest. And in most of the nine states Obama won that Sen. John F. Kerry lost in 2004 – Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Florida, Iowa, New Mexico, Nevada, Virginia and Colorado – Democrats took a drubbing in the midterms. One poll has half the voters in Ohio down on Obama’s job performance, for instance.

Democrats say they are encouraged that the Republican governors in three critical states – Rick Scott in Florida, John Kasich in Ohio and Scott Walker in Wisconsin – have taken a hit in polls in recent months, and look like they may be less help to the Republican nominee than they would be if they were politically stronger.

Looking at Obama’s 2008 swing-state wins, Democrats have all but given up on Indiana, and know that he will have trouble keeping two other traditionally red states, Virginia and North Carolina; may have been hurt in Florida by unhappiness in the Jewish community about Obama’s handling of Israel; and will have a dogfight for the Rust Belt prizes of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan (where one respected state poll had him narrowly lagging Romney). Obama’s reelection strategy depends on running strong in the Mountain West, most critically in Colorado.

But without at least a couple of the traditional bellwether states, Obama will be a one-term president.

There is still plenty of time to go before the 2012 election, but make no mistake about it, President Obama is in trouble. 


DNC Boosts Romney

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 04•11

In any primary campaign, the obvious strategy is to ignore your rivals and direct your fire at the general election opponent — and then fall to your knees to hope and pray that that candidate takes the bait and fires back. The point is to marginalize your primary opponents to irrelevance  by creating the perception that the race is between two candidates, yours and the November opponent.

It is exactly the strategy Mitt Romney has been taking, and it’s working. President Obama’s team is firing back at Romney almost exclusively according to this report today. That’s great news for the former Massachusetts governor. It will make more Republicans circle their wagons around him and help him raise money off Obama’s remarks.

From the incumbent side, the cardinal rule is to ignore the candidates engaged in a primary to run against you — unless one of those candidates poses a genuine risk. Romney does.  Poll after poll is showing Romney close or surpassing Obama in state after state. Romney is now leading in Pennsylvania, which Obama must win, and he is effectively tied in Florida.  What’s more alarming to Team Obama, though, is that, in state-after-state, the President polls far below 50, in the 40-43% range.  That’s an alarm bell for an incumbent.  Undecided voters swing to the challenger by about 65% normally, meaning that President Obama would get trounced today in states he won easily in 2008.

Romney is running an awfully good campaign this year.  He’s staying out of the ugliness and raising money, exactly what he should be doing at this point in the race.  And when he gets the opportunity to take a clean shot, he aims it at the White House. Fortunately for him, the White House is firing back. 

9-11 Cartoon? Bad Idea? Good Idea?

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 03•11

http://youtu.be/D9vNsYQ5rLk

Mike Huckabee has created a company that is making historical cartoons for children, CBS News is reporting.  Three have been made, including one on 9-11.  Excerpts from that episode are above.

I’m not sure what I think of that, but I think I might like the idea. I think.

I was recently trying to explain to my almost-five-year-old daughter what happened on 9-11 after passing the site in a car. It was a lot harder than I thought it would be, and I eventually regretted trying it.  Children at that age want visuals — they reach for the book after every paragraph to “let me see” — and there was nothing acceptable to show her, nothing she could properly grasp at her age.

Maybe Huckabee has found a way to address these tough but important topics with children.  But at the same time, cartoonizing them feels a little wrong. 

Will have to think more about this one. 

 

Frasier for Senate II

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 03•11

http://youtu.be/ehMl-CztpnA

The guy does have a nice style — and a bit of a populist streak if this video is any indication. Kelsey Grammer for U.S  Senate 2012.  It really may be worth a look. 

Quote of the Day, Eric Cantor

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 03•11

 

“I think, frankly, he’s in over his head as to what to do about this economy,” Virginia congressman Eric Cantor on President Obama in interview with The Wall Street Journal

You’re All Fools!

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 03•11

from satiricalpolitical.com

My wife watches Jon Stewart every night. It’s payback for, well, a lot of things.

She mercifully tapes the show so she can watch it around me, generally while I’m punching out a last item for this page in an office off our bedroom. But I can hear the guy. His voice cuts through the wall, rather like a chain saw.

What bugs me most is when he makes me laugh. Because he is hysterically funny at times, and I get mad at myself when I succumb to his humor. But its tough: he’s smart and quick-witted. Not quite Dennis-Miller-quick, but close and with his own enviable style.

But while involuntarily listening to Stewart over the past few nights, and in reading opinion pieces by leading thinkers of the American Left, I can’t help but notice how very off the mainstream American script they are beginning to read. They have become utterly unconvincing in their arguments.  

I’m generally confident about my political opinions. But I’m  rarely 100% sure. I’ve been wrong about far too many things over the years, and certain certitudes of my youth have attained a hue of grey over time. But the Stewarts of the world are making me feel a whole lot better of late.

The issue that marks them as most unreasonable, indeed, irrational, is U.S. debt. Some refuse to acknowledge it as a valid issue; some say it’s normal, even healthy, like a mortgage or a car loan, and all of them point to the richest Americans — that greedy one percent that already pays almost half the income tax in America — as the dastardly villains of American decline (never mind that if the government expropriated the wealth of every one of them, it would barely dent the federal deficit.)

The Left is calling for higher taxes and more spending at a  time when the average American instinctively sees higher spending and taxing as an existential crisis. This may be the worst moment in U.S. history to make that argument.

The Paul Krugman’s of the world tell readers on a daily basis how stupid they are:  “We’re all broke,” they shout. “Spend!  It’s the way forward. Keynes said so.” The academics know better. They learned counterintuitiveness at Harvard.

That’s the bottom line. The Left is calling on Americans to abandon the reason and common sense hardwired in their brains, to head deeper into the dark tunnel rather than into the light in the distance. They want us to ignore our instincts and listen to them at a critical time in our nation’s history.

All I can say is “good luck with that.”

Frasier for Senate?

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 02•11

Celebrity Republican Kelsey Grammer is reportedly looking at a run for Mayor of New York City.  I don’t buy it.  I bet he’s looking at U.S. Senate. If he’s serious about running, he has to be looking at the 2012 Senate race. It makes a lot more sense.  Running as a Republican statewide, while extremely challenging, is far more winnable than running as a Republican in the five boroughs.  And there is a clear line of attack against the Washington incumbent. 

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) threw her lot in with the hard Left in New York again today, rejecting the compromise debt ceiling bill negotiated by President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), and House Speaker John Boehner (R).  Even Senator Chuck Schumer (D) voted for the bill. Gillibrand’s vote shows that she remains more afraid of New York’s union-backed and ACORN-inspired Working Families Party than she is of any Republican challenger.  The former Big Tobacco lawyer is watching her left flank more closely than her right. 

Kelsey Grammer could make Gillibrand rue her leftward tact in a New York minute.  He would bring money, name ID, and pizzaz to a 2012 contest that today looks like a forgone conclusion. Grammer is eminently likable and he knows the campaign trail, having stumped for Republicans like Rudy Giuliani.  

Frasier for U.S. Senate.  I like it. It has a ring to it…

 

 

 

 

Swing State Swindle

Written By: William F. B. O'Reilly - Aug• 02•11

The federal government is now mandating that Pennsylvanians on public assistance be given free cell phones and monthly calling minutes on the public dime, The New York Post reports today.  And guess who pays for it?  Everyone else of course. The Obama Administration is using Pennsylvania, a swing-state in the 2012 election, as a test ground for this new “civil right”, called the Universal Service Fund. Expect this push in the other 49 states as well, beginning in, say, Michigan, Ohio, Florida, Minnesota, and Virginia .

 What does this fall under? Pursuit of happiness?