I’ve often wondered what would happen if a popular presidential candidate stopped showing up at events around the country, instead relying 100% on surrogates to extol his advantages. “John Smith is qualified, busy — and he’s not a blow-hard.” That would be the essential message.
That’s the way campaigns were waged in the old days, when self-promotion was considered base. I’ve wondered if that can be revived. Could it add supreme gravitas to a candidacy, mystique even? I thought about that a lot during John McCain’s ill-fated presidential campaign, where the demands of constant travel showed his age more than anything else. While Barack Obama did card tricks with a tele-prompter, what if McCain had stayed in Washington or Arizona for the entire campaign and worked? (He did that for a week to his detriment; but it was done poorly.)
The idea is probably preposterous: Candidates need to show up places to drive local news coverage, and funders want to see candidates in person at fundraisers. But still, I love the idea — for the right candidate. (Mitch Daniels might be able to pull it off, for example.)
I don’t think that candidate is Herman Cain. He’s too unknown; he needs to beat the hustings as much as he can. But I thought about the concept this morning again while reading this Salon story about Cain leading in Iowa polls, but not showing up in the state. It is a paradox that has a lot of people scratching their heads.
There is something to be said about the unseen celebrity. He grows stronger and taller with every non-appearance.
Leave a Reply